So, the Supreme Court decided to waste their time and tax payer money by allowing “under God” to remain in the constitution.
They decided that since the child’s father in a custody fight that he is not her guardian. Fine and Dandy, but why on Earth did you all hear the case to begin with? You agreed to allow the case to come before the court. It was heard before the court, and you all wussed out on a real decision. Grow some nads.
This court needs some serious reshuffling. There are too many ideologues on the bench.
Whether you want to keep the “under God” in the pledge or not, don’t we deserve a real decision. Pro or Con would have been better that this lame excuse.